CONTRAST?

C. S. Lewis

Prop. 18c.01
In today’s gospel lesson, Jesus,
who taught us to love
(Philos-unconditionally? Jt.) our enemies, now tells us to hate our families (in the same way? Jt.). Elsewhere he says our enemies will be our families. So what are we to do – love (Eros? Rape? J.t) them as enemies or hate them as families (Agape Conditioned? Jt.)?
Tricky, isn’t it?

Well, when Scriptures seem to conflict it sometimes helps to study the words closely. What did Jesus’ actual words really mean?

When Jesus says to love our enemies, he doesn’t mean by “love” what we might think. He doesn’t mean sentimental fondness. He means to wish them well and to act accordingly,  in ways that allow them to flourish and be happy. He means to direct blessing in their direction in our thoughts, words, and deeds.

And the word we have translated as “hate” doesn’t mean to cultivate hostility. It doesn’t mean to nurse a grudge. It isn’t a feeling word at all. It means to abandon, to leave behind, to let go. Still a hard saying – but now we can work with it.

In our language, love and hate are opposites, but Jesus’ words weren’t opposites. So we need to ask whether one may abandon one’s family in a way that blesses them. Psychologist and sex therapist, David Schnarch, regards the main problem in marriages as being not failure to communicate, not indifference, not having drifted apart -- but quite the opposite,  the problem of being too close. It’s called emotional fusion; which means a bond of dependency in which each person’s feelings and moods shift automatically in response to the other. It’s basing our mood on the tone of someone else’s voice. Emotional fusion often wears the name tag of love; but is the death of real intimacy.

Fusion sometimes manifests as family violence. More often, it just produces patterns of perpetual misery in which no one ever becomes themselves; no one ever lives their lives. Or it produces patterns of rebellion, which are just emotional fusion wearing a different name tag.

The opposite of fusion is differentiation. Differentiation is the ability to remain one’s authentic self in a relationship. Differentiation doesn’t mean we don’t care about others. It means that we don’t depend on them to make us feel whatever way we are trying to feel. It means their anger does not automatically produce our fear, guilt, defensiveness, or counter-hostility. Their behavior doesn’t pull our strings and make us dance. And we don’t need them dance to our tune either.

Now back to the point of Jesus’ strange teaching that we should abandon and that we should love: Schnarch says in his book, Passionate Marriage, “Becoming more differentiated is possibly the most loving thing you can do... – for those you love as well as yourself.”

There is a kind of abandonment that doesn’t require getting divorced, moving out, or getting separate bank accounts. It’s abandoning the fused relationship; it’s giving up trying to make people think, feel, and act the way we want; it’s declaring our independence of them in our struggle to become ourselves.

[The truth to which our Gospel lesson points is fleshed out by C. S. Lewis, in his classic The Four Loves. New Testament Greek has four words for love. The first three are familiar kinds of love  we all experience quite naturally: eros, which means romantic love; philos, which is friendship; and storge, which means the kind of affection we feel for family members including pets.

Each of these loves is good in itself; but standing alone they are unstable. They invariably lead to something else. They either degrade into fusion; or they mature into the fourth kind of love,


Agape is the love a differentiated person feels and lives out for another. It is compassionate, patient, and unconditional. It doesn’t need the other person to be different than they are; so it doesn’t manipulate or play games.

Agape is the opposite of emotional fusion. So insofar as our romances, our friendships, and our family loves are grounded in agape and are growing toward agape, such relationships are instruments of grace, crucibles in which we are sanctified and we sanctify each other.

Insofar as they are not grounded in agape, insofar as they are mired in fusion, insofar as they consist of repetitive patterns of blame-shifting, codependency, self-martyring, exploitation, and addiction, then they are obstacles on our path.

The step away from fusion and toward differentiation, the step toward agape, is a kind of abandonment. We aren’t abandoning the real person. We are abandoning the false person, the role they play in our lives. It sounds healthy, but (trust me) it hurts.

So Jesus is giving us a hard saying. He is calling us to let go of the familiar patterns of relationship that make up our lives. But he isn’t calling us to animosity. Quite the contrary,
he wants us to love agape-style out of a differentiated self. He wants us to walk our own spiritual paths, looking to him – not our families, lovers, and friends –to save us, to heal us.

Then we can offer those good people a gift we could never have given when we were still loving in our fused, dependent way. We can give the gift of our caring unconditional presence, the gift of love which asks nothing, but blesses beyond measure. Amen.
 

today's gospel lesson Luke 14:25-33

Now large crowds were traveling with Jesus; and he turned and said to them, "Whoever comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and even life itself, cannot be my disciple. Whoever does not carry the cross and follow me cannot be my disciple. For which of you, intending to build a tower, does not first sit down and estimate the cost, to see whether he has enough to complete it? Otherwise, when he has laid a foundation and is not able to finish, all who see it will begin to ridicule him, saying, `This fellow began to build and was not able to finish.' Or what king, going out to wage war against another king, will not sit down first and consider whether he is able with ten thousand to oppose the one who comes against him with twenty thousand? If he cannot, then, while the other is still far away, he sends a delegation and asks for the terms of peace. So therefore, none of you can become my disciple if you do not give up all your possessions."

Optional parts of the readings are set off in square brackets.

The Bible texts of the Old Testament, Epistle and Gospel lessons are from the New Revised Standard Version Bible, copyright 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Church of Christ in the USA, and used by permission.

 
 
 Notice!    This is not a DIFFERENCE, but it is  ANOTHER IDEA, is't it
 
There are two Greek words, fhiloς, eroς, and one Turkish/ Hebrew  word, agape, written with Greek letters. (Why did Jesus  use the Turkish word for Lord?). Notice, again: aga (a-ga) n. Also a-gha.  A high official of the Ottoman Empire. [Turkish a-ga, "lord". {"root word"} and peh, “mouth”, from the Hebrew language.]  The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 1969 pg. 23 and pg. 963.
Jesus, as a Lord, A High Official from Heaven says, "Love Me, Peter, and do what I say. Finish my conditions. Take care of the baby! You will be given a better position when we get home". Amen! This thought is shown every where that the word aga-pe is used. This Authority began in Heaven, given to Adam, and continued through to you and me. You, too, have authority. Learning how to give respect to "authority" (sometimes, it is themselves) is a necessary art. Amen!

 

To see more, check here; or call me now.  Amen!  1-212-926-2683.

<fitnfreejt@msn.com>

 
 
 

The Four Loves

By C.S. Lewis

     I read this beautiful book by C.S. Lewes while teaching on love last month. The book was originally published in 1960 and was republished in 1988. There is an audio version of this series that is, I understand, the only recording of C.S. Lewis.

     Lewis calls storge “affection” and defines it as the normal love among family members. The Bible only uses the word compounded to another (Rom 1:31, 12:10, 2 Tim 3:3). Philos is called “friendship” and of course, appears often in the New Testament. This is a splendid chapter on a concept which should be renewed in our churches and yet kept separate from agape. Eros is a most interesting word coming largely from Greek mythology (the Roman Cupid). Lewis calls the evil side Venus (the lover of Cupid) and the neutral side (as in marriage) Eros. For agape Lewis likes the old English word “Charity” because this is truly a giving love. Not used before the New Testament, this word is defined solely by God’s use of it. It is Lewis’ contention that few believers experience true agape (in 2 Peter 1 it comes last in the list).

     The value of the book to our generation is that we tend to lump all four meanings into one word “love” and then try to apply any Biblical reference any time we want. All our concepts are taught in the Bible but they are unique and should be kept that way. I have a greater appreciation for all four loves after having read the book.

http://www.bethelbaptch.com/Aletheia%20Articles/march_1993.htm

 
 
copyright  ©  2000-2009 FITNFREE

 

  Please tell us what you think about our web site. If you provide us your contact information, we will e-mail or call if necessary.Thanks again, for help.     fitnfree1@live.com.